Long Island Pulse | Everything You Need To Know For Your Life on Long Island

advertise  |  subscribe  |  free issue
Do You 2D?
  • LIPulse Plus Nav
  • Blogs
  • Current Issue
  • Dining Guide
  • Events
  • iTunes Store
  • Pulse Products
  • Splash Pages
  • Video Gallery

 Business | Human Resources

Off-Duty Blogging

Author: Ellen R. Storch, Esq. | Published: Friday, July 31, 2009


More adults are blogging and using social networking sites than ever before. If employees use company computers to blog, update their Facebook status or to “tweet,” employers generally have a right to monitor and limit those activities. Likewise, employers can properly prohibit personal use of the Internet during working hours. But what, if anything, can employers do about what employees put on the Internet during off hours from their personal computers?
It depends.

In New York, employers are statutorily prohibited from discriminating against employees because of their lawful off-duty recreational conduct. And federal law forbids employers from interfering with an employee’s right to engage in concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining. Blogging may be considered such concerted activity.

More adults are blogging and using social networking sites than ever before.

However, if an employee publicly disparages their employer on the web, they may be breaching their duty of loyalty to their employer and/or engaging in defamatory speech. The employer may be able to require the employee to remove the offensive comment or at least eliminate any overt or implicit references to the employer. If the employee refuses to do so, he or she may be disciplined and assuming the employee is at-will, termination may be appropriate.

In order to reduce the possibility of such conflicts, employers should ensure that their electronic communications policy advises employees what the rules are regarding the Internet, including what is prohibited during off-duty hours. For example, the policy should prohibit the disclosure of financial information, trade secrets and any confidential information of the employer. The policy should also instruct employees not to disparage the employer, its products or its customers, and should forbid the use of the company logo. Likewise, the policy may properly instruct employees to post a disclaimer stating that they are not blogging on the company’s behalf. Employers should have counsel review the policy before distributing it to ensure that it does not inadvertently prohibit blogging that may arguably be legally protected.

 

Ellen R. Storch, Esq.
Author: Ellen R. Storch, Esq.
Ellemn R. Storch is an employment attorney with the firm Kaufman Dolowich Voluck & Gonzo LLP. Contact her at estorch@gdvglaw.com

Reader Comments | read reactions to this article

Jerry Hart wrote on August 28, 2009

Very interesting article. However, how should employers manage employees who post information that could expose themselves to harm in the form of intimidation - even kidnap - in order to extract information about their employers’ business? The information employees post may appear to be totally innocuous (social activities, mention of children, indications of address), but to an intelligent and determined criminal, may provide in-roads to develop opportunities for offending. Of course, the employer may offer counsel, but this is difficult to do without scaring the employee and creating the impression that they’ve chosen a dangerous place to work. Any thoughts?

Add Your Comment

Only your name and comment will show up on the site. Email and URL are not shared with site visitors.

Name:
Email:
URL:
Comments:

Remember me?

Shoot me an email when someone responds?

Submit the word you see below: