Long Island Pulse | Everything You Need To Know For Your Life on Long Island

advertise  |  subscribe  |  free issue
Do You 2D?
  • LIPulse Plus Nav
  • Blogs
  • Current Issue
  • Dining Guide
  • Events
  • iTunes Store
  • Pulse Products
  • Splash Pages
  • Video Gallery

 Business | Legal

Mob Tyranny

By Kimberly S. Jones

Author: Kimberly Jones | Published: Sunday, September 27, 2009


No guns at political fights


Have you seen the pictures of protesters with unconcealed weapons outside of rallies for President Obama? Is anyone as appalled and shocked as I am? I am torn: Should we celebrate the confirmation of the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech or is the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms what we should be talking about? Maybe it’s the dysfunction of contemporary American politics and the gridlock created by partisan machinations. These subjects are all worthy of inspection, but something else caught my eye—the concept of political bullies.

A bully is defined as a “blustering, browbeating person; especially: one habitually cruel to others who are weaker.” Bullies and bullying aren’t just for children and teenagers anymore. But once an individual straps on a semi-automatic weapon, he may be stronger, but not smarter. American history is full of fights against those who are habitually cruel to others who are weaker. It’s part of what makes America and the American Dream so attractive to the rest of the world. The issues on the table—health care, war, torture, immigration, the environment and the economy—must be confronted head-on, but with rational, reasonable debate. There will be, and should be, disagreements about how to resolve these problems in the best interests of America and all of its residents. The television and radio are filled with folks who, with their blustering and browbeating rhetoric, incite behavior and speech that don’t enhance or promote intelligent, useful debate.

Former Alaska governor Sarah Palin gave us a preview of the potency of the vicious recklessness of political discourse when she distracted us with claims that President Obama “used to pal around with terrorists.” Remember the ugly, scared response from the crowds…the mobs? We should see the tactics of bullies with guns and microphones for what they are—distractions. Our government’s system of checks and balances was created to fight against the tyranny of a mob. We shouldn’t try to settle American political disagreements by strapping on a firearm. Bullies thrive on fear and the absence of reason. Stand up for our democracy with your participation. And speak out against the bullying tactics of these political mobs. But please, no more guns at political fights.

Kimberly Jones
Author: Kimberly Jones
Kimberly S. Jones, Esq. is an attorney and policy advocate. She can be reached at ksjesq@msn.com.

Reader Comments | read reactions to this article

HarryB wrote on October 25, 2009

Ms. Jones seems to be living in Neverland. It seems odd to her that people carry guns, yes even the gentleman with the rifle, in states where it’s a right to freely carry firearms. They probably had them “strapped on” the day before the Prez visited and the day after; he was the exception, not them.
The bullies currently running the US are making the last bunch look better in retrospect.
As for Palin, I think all reasoning people could understand her statement vis a vis Ayers. It becomes truly relevant with the revelations abt his involvement in writing BHO’s book.
The current crop in Congress seem to be leaning more towards writing checks and upsetting any semblance of balance we might’ve had; Rahm and the Prez are the ones advocating guns to a knife fight anyway.

Add Your Comment

Only your name and comment will show up on the site. Email and URL are not shared with site visitors.

Name:
Email:
URL:
Comments:

Remember me?

Shoot me an email when someone responds?

Submit the word you see below: